Is Self-Realisation A Quantum Phenomenon
The morning routine: As i wash my face, i see myself in the mirror. I am aware of myself. The face, the es and the rather sparse, dishevelled ir. Suddenly, i realise that 'T' am serving the image that is actually elated by myself. The image and its guidance are both generated by yself. The image, testimony to my instance created by myself, of myself d for myself. The image is not me, and ll, i know it's me. It is a virtual me. ho are you? Who is the real me? The subject, the jest or the awareness that tells me i'm other? Theentire process of 'me' ginseng myself is a complex enomenon. The observer, the observant observation is critical and -reply interconnected and inseparable. a virtual image sufficient testimony my 'Being'? Is my tangible form the only affidavit to my "Beingness"? Can i cognise my Being without relying only on objective perception? Aware of existence Consciousness is awareness of your body and your environment; self-awareness is recognition of that consciousness -comprehending that you are aware of your existence. It is the awareness of 'i' that creates the observer/observed dichotomy to arise. The awareness of one's existence becomes the reference point to cognise the external world. This 'i' becomes a separate entity and brings to existence all that is seen as 'i' and 'not i'. The identification of 'i' is a wave that ripples outwards, which causes and spawns this entire Creation into existence and simultaneously observes it, too. Mirror neurons Neurologist Vilayanur Ramachandran says, "Self-awareness is simply using mirror neurons for 'looking at myself as if someone else is looking at me' (the word 'me’ encompassing some of my brain processes, as well).The mirror neuron mechanism-the same algorithm -that originally evolved to help you adopt another's point of view was turned inward to look at your own self. Philippi, Redraft and their colleagues' research suggests different areas in the brain cannot by themselves account for conscious recognition of self. Instead, they propose that self-awareness is a far more diffuse cognitive process, relying on many parts of the brain, including regions not located in the cerebral cortex. All possible states Quantum physics maintains that a system exists in superposition-that is, in all possible states-until an observer observes it in one specific state. Could that mean that until i observe myself, i am in a superposition all possible states? Does observation of my tangible form reduce the undifferentiated, impersonal consciousness into a locuthat i believe to be Me? 'I' may therecannot necessarily be 'Me' until the act observations reduces 'I' to 'me'. Could this act of Self-appraisal actually resin limiting the super-potential of 'IT'trestrictive potential called 'me"? Quantum superposition 'Me' often adulterates 'I' with various kinds of conditioning, bias complexes and limitations. Self-realisation may just bathe 'I"discardingthe image of 'me'-revert to a fundamental state of quantum superposition.
DISCLAIMER:
The views expressed in the Article above are Deepak M Ranade views and kashmiribhatta.in is not in any way responsible for the opinions expressed in the above article. The article belongs to its respective owner or owners and this site does not claim any right over it.
Courtesy: Deepak M Ranade and Speaking Tree,Times of India
Is Self-Realisation A Quantum Phenomenon
The morning routine: As i wash my face, i see myself in the mirror. I am aware of myself. The face, the es and the rather sparse, dishevelled ir. Suddenly, i realise that 'T' am serving the image that is actually elated by myself. The image and its guidance are both generated by yself. The image, testimony to my instance created by myself, of myself d for myself. The image is not me, and ll, i know it's me. It is a virtual me. ho are you? Who is the real me? The subject, the jest or the awareness that tells me i'm other? Theentire process of 'me' ginseng myself is a complex enomenon. The observer, the observant observation is critical and -reply interconnected and inseparable. a virtual image sufficient testimony my 'Being'? Is my tangible form the only affidavit to my "Beingness"? Can i cognise my Being without relying only on objective perception? Aware of existence Consciousness is awareness of your body and your environment; self-awareness is recognition of that consciousness -comprehending that you are aware of your existence. It is the awareness of 'i' that creates the observer/observed dichotomy to arise. The awareness of one's existence becomes the reference point to cognise the external world. This 'i' becomes a separate entity and brings to existence all that is seen as 'i' and 'not i'. The identification of 'i' is a wave that ripples outwards, which causes and spawns this entire Creation into existence and simultaneously observes it, too. Mirror neurons Neurologist Vilayanur Ramachandran says, "Self-awareness is simply using mirror neurons for 'looking at myself as if someone else is looking at me' (the word 'me’ encompassing some of my brain processes, as well).The mirror neuron mechanism-the same algorithm -that originally evolved to help you adopt another's point of view was turned inward to look at your own self. Philippi, Redraft and their colleagues' research suggests different areas in the brain cannot by themselves account for conscious recognition of self. Instead, they propose that self-awareness is a far more diffuse cognitive process, relying on many parts of the brain, including regions not located in the cerebral cortex. All possible states Quantum physics maintains that a system exists in superposition-that is, in all possible states-until an observer observes it in one specific state. Could that mean that until i observe myself, i am in a superposition all possible states? Does observation of my tangible form reduce the undifferentiated, impersonal consciousness into a locuthat i believe to be Me? 'I' may therecannot necessarily be 'Me' until the act observations reduces 'I' to 'me'. Could this act of Self-appraisal actually resin limiting the super-potential of 'IT'trestrictive potential called 'me"? Quantum superposition 'Me' often adulterates 'I' with various kinds of conditioning, bias complexes and limitations. Self-realisation may just bathe 'I"discardingthe image of 'me'-revert to a fundamental state of quantum superposition.
DISCLAIMER:
The views expressed in the Article above are Deepak M Ranade views and kashmiribhatta.in is not in any way responsible for the opinions expressed in the above article. The article belongs to its respective owner or owners and this site does not claim any right over it.
Courtesy: Deepak M Ranade and Speaking Tree,Times of India